NextAction refactoring to eliminate sentinel arrays and pointers (#1923)

<!--
> [!WARNING]
> **This is a DRAFT PR.**
> The structure is not definitive. The code might not be optimised yet.
It might not even start nor compile yet.
> **Don't panic. ✋ It's going to be ok. 👌 We can make modifications, we
can fix things.** 😁
-->
# Description

This PR aims to refactor the NextAction declaration to achieve two
goals:

## Eliminate C-style sentinel arrays

Currently, a double pointer (`NextAction**`) approach is being used.
This an old pre-C++11 (< 2011) trick before `std::vector<>` became a
thing.
This approach is painful for developers because they constantly need to
declare their `NextAction` arrays as:
```cpp
NextAction::array(0, new NextAction("foo", 1.0f), nullptr)
```
Instead of:
```cpp
{ new NextAction("foo", 1.0f) }
```
The first argument of `NextAction::array` is actually a hack. It is used
to have a named argument so `va_args` can find the remaining arguments.
It is set to 0 everywhere but in fact does nothing. This is very
confusing to people unfamiliar with this antiquated syntax.
The last argument `nullptr` is what we call a sentinel. It's a `nullptr`
because `va_args` is looking for a `nullptr` to stop iterating. It's
also a hack and also leads to confusion.

## Eliminate unnecessary pointers for `NextAction`

Pointers can be used for several reasons, to cite a few:
- Indicate strong, absolute identity.
- Provide strong but transferable ownership (unlike references).
- When a null value is acceptable (`nullptr`).
- When copy is expensive.

`NextAction` meets none of these criteria:
- It has no identity because it is purely behavioural.
- It is never owned by anything as it is passed around and never fetched
from a registry.
- The only situations where it can be `nullptr` are errors that should
in fact throw an `std::invalid_argument` instead.
- They are extremely small objects that embark a single `std::string`
and a single `float`.

Pointers should be avoided when not strictly necessary because they can
quickly lead to undefined behaviour due to unhandled `nullptr`
situations. They also make the syntax heavier due to the necessity to
constantly check for `nullptr`. Finally, they aren't even good for
performance in that situation because shifting a pointer so many times
is likely more expensive than copying such a trivial object.

# End goal

The end goal is to declare `NextAction` arrays this way:
```cpp
{ NextAction("foo", 1.0f) }
```

> [!NOTE]
> Additional note: `NextAction` is nothing but a hacky proxy to an
`Action` constructor. This should eventually be reworked to use handles
instead of strings. This would make copying `NextAction` even cheaper
and remove the need for the extremely heavy stringly typed current
approach. Stringly typed entities are a known anti-pattern so we need to
move on from those.

src/strategy/generic/DeadStrategy.cpp

@@ -12,21 +12,21 @@ void DeadStrategy::InitTriggers(std::vector<TriggerNode*>& triggers)
     PassTroughStrategy::InitTriggers(triggers);
 
     triggers.push_back(
-        new TriggerNode("often", NextAction::array(0, new NextAction("auto release", relevance), nullptr)));
+        new TriggerNode("often", { NextAction("auto release", relevance) }));
     triggers.push_back(
-        new TriggerNode("bg active", NextAction::array(0, new NextAction("auto release", relevance), nullptr)));
+        new TriggerNode("bg active", { NextAction("auto release", relevance) }));
     triggers.push_back(
-        new TriggerNode("dead", NextAction::array(0, new NextAction("find corpse", relevance), nullptr)));
+        new TriggerNode("dead", { NextAction("find corpse", relevance) }));
     triggers.push_back(new TriggerNode(
-        "corpse near", NextAction::array(0, new NextAction("revive from corpse", relevance - 1.0f), nullptr)));
+        "corpse near", { NextAction("revive from corpse", relevance - 1.0f) }));
     triggers.push_back(new TriggerNode("resurrect request",
-                                       NextAction::array(0, new NextAction("accept resurrect", relevance), nullptr)));
+                                       { NextAction("accept resurrect", relevance) }));
     triggers.push_back(
-        new TriggerNode("falling far", NextAction::array(0, new NextAction("repop", relevance + 1.f), nullptr)));
+        new TriggerNode("falling far", { NextAction("repop", relevance + 1.f) }));
     triggers.push_back(
-        new TriggerNode("location stuck", NextAction::array(0, new NextAction("repop", relevance + 1), nullptr)));
+        new TriggerNode("location stuck", { NextAction("repop", relevance + 1) }));
     triggers.push_back(new TriggerNode(
-        "can self resurrect", NextAction::array(0, new NextAction("self resurrect", relevance + 2.0f), nullptr)));
+        "can self resurrect", { NextAction("self resurrect", relevance + 2.0f) }));
 }
 
 DeadStrategy::DeadStrategy(PlayerbotAI* botAI) : PassTroughStrategy(botAI) {}